References
1. Hirsh D., Worley P. Better learning, better doctors, better community: how transforming clinical education can help repair society. Med Educ. 2013; 47 (9): 942–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12278 PMID: 23931543.
2. Gruppen L.D., ten Cate O., Lingard L.A., Teunissen P.W., Kogan J.R. Enhanced requirements for assessment in a competency‐based, time‐variable medical education system. Acad Med. 2018; 93 (3S): S17–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002066 PMID: 29485482.
3. Osman N.Y., Hirsh D.A. The organizational growth mindset: animating improvement and innovation in medical education. Med Educ. 2020; 55: 416–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14446 PMID: 33377544.
4. Scheiter K., Gerjets P., Huk T., Imhof B., Kammerer Y. The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learn Instr. 2009; 19 (6): 481–94. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.08.001
5. Jenkinson J.J. Molecular biology meets the learning sciences: visualizations in education and outreach. Mol Biol. 2018; 430 (21): 4013–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.08.020 PMID: 30170006.
6. Greene S.J. The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018; 11 (5): 445–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1784 PMID: 29624896.
7. Nordqvist O., Aronsson H. It Is time for a new direction in biotechnology education research. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019; 47 (2): 189–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21214 PMID: 30681244.
8. Lang J., Repp H. Artificial intelligence in medical education and the meaning of interaction with natural intelligence – an interdisciplinary approach. GMS J Med Educ. 2020; 37 (6): Doc59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001352 PMID: 33225051.
9. Herbert C., Velan G.M., Pryor W.M., Kumar R.K. A model for the use of blended learning in large group teaching sessions. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17 (1): 197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1057-2 PMID: 29121908. PMCID: PMC5680783.
10. Salim H., Lee P.Y., Ghazali S.S., Ching S.M., Ali H., Shamsuddin N.H., et al. Perceptions toward a pilot project on blended learning in Malaysian family medicine postgraduate training: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2018. Vol. 18, N 1. P. 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1315-y PMID: 30157829. PMCID: PMC6116558.
11. Azizi S.M., Roozbahani N., Khatony A. Factors affecting the acceptance of blended learning in medical education: application of UTAUT2 model. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20: 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02302-2 PMCID: PMC7565754.
12. Coyne E., Rands H., Frommolt V., Kain V., Plugge M., Mitchell M. Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 63: 101–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.021 PMID: 29425738.
13. Gegenfurtner A., Kok E., van Geel K., de Bruin A., Jarodzka H., Szulewski A., et al. The challenges of studying visual expertise in medical image diagnosis. Med Educ. 2017; 51 (1): 97–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13205 PMID: 27981656.
14. Perepelitsa S.A. Prospects for the use of STEAM training in medical education. In: Strategic Guidelines for the Development of Higher Education. Collection of Scientific Papers of the Participants of the II National Scientific and Practical Conference [Electronic resource]. Moscow: RUSAYNS. 2020: 187–92. ISBN 978-5-4365-6578-1. (in Russian)
15. Okemow S.J. Storyboarding in medical animation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1235: 131–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_8 PMID: 32488640.
16. Berney S., Bétrancourt M. Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2016; 101: 150–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005.
17. Boye S., Moen T., Vik T. An e-learning course in medical immunology: does it improve learning outcome? Med. Teach. 2012; 34 (9): e649–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.675456 PMID:22497322.
18. Pandey N., Anwer E., Salam A., Pandey S., Gupta S. 3-D medical animation could be helpful tool for integration of medical curriculum. Med Teach. 2015; 37 (1): 99–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.940884 PMID: 25052216.
19. Vogt L., Duckwitz V., Arlt S.P., Haimerl P., Bartel A., Hautzinger C., et al. Teaching small animal reproduction via virtual patients. Reprod Domest Anim. 2020; 55 (2): 81–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13598 PMID: 31880350.